Today another brickwall came down as a result of DNA analysis. Brickwalls are often left in place when documentation can’t get you back to your forebears. Today we finally know who Anna Hamre was back in Norway. Born in 1834, Anna Hamre came to America and married John (Johan) Dahle. Few records exist to place her though it was fair to assume she was from a place called Hamre. After a DNA match to a Christopher Hamre descendent of Southern Minnesota, the search was on. Eventually it was confirmed that Christopher had a sister Anna also born in May of 1835 and they were from Hamre. No other family matches would have provided the distance in the calculation and after a bit of digging at Digital Arkivet, the match was made.
Anna Hamre was born Anna Christophersdotter on the 21st of May, 1835 in Leikanger, Sogn og Fjordane, Norway. They lived at Hamre and then at Veten just west of Leikanger. This is not to be confused with Hamre church close to Bergen, which is the former municipality of Hamre.
It’s a great feeling when a brickwall comes down!
Note that we have now moved the Pearson and Harmening branches under the main branch of the tree. Previously there were three “books” to this site, the Bly book, Pearson Book and my own biological family research. These have now been consolidated down into two. If you have issues finding a record at its new location, please contact us!
Location data has been updated so google map functionality now works on pedigree maps and such. The records have been updated on the datasets for the Pearson family and James Bly Biological family. Location formats still need to be updated on the Bly family portion which is the oldest dataset. We hope to complete that work soon. Enjoy.
A number of updates have been made to the living relatives in the Bistodeau family. These came from a recent family reunion for Adlor Bistodeau’s kids. Most of the updates shared have now been entered into the tree. Enjoy!
There is one relation in the tree that has been suspicious to me for some time. Doing some additional research on the newly discovered Harris family line I found two things. First, I found a lot of bad genealogical research and redacted a number of records on the internet due to insufficient supporting information. (This information seems to have come from a rush to attach the line to old English royalty.)
However I did find another branch that seems to have been ignored which did connect that family to King Henry III’s brother Richard. This is a much better link to the genealogy of Charlamagne which is also recorded in the tree so I have eliminated the previous spurious link until I can find more supporting evidence there. Hopefully this record will help future Harris family researchers avoid the errors of others.
Note: For record’s sake, the error is in attributing Joan Percy m. Sir Arthur Harris to be the daughter of Sir Thomas Percy. Arthur Harris was born around 1466 while Thomas Percy was born in 1504. Therefore Joan Percy would be more likely to be two generations before Thomas. While she is likely a member of the same Percy family, the link as documented is incorrect.
Naturally the first question you might ask is, does she weigh the same as a duck? However witches in historic American narratives have a much darker past. As it stands, we have one in ours and her story is worth remembering to this day.
Her name is Ann (Alcock) Foster and she died in prison in Salem Massachusetts. She was accused of witchcraft after some people who were searching for the source of another woman’s illness “fell into fits” upon seeing her. At that time she was 72 years of age. She was “put to the question” (tortured for her confession) but refused to admit any wrong doing. It wasn’t until they threatened to charge her daughter and grand-daughter as well, that she finally accepted the charges and pled her guilt. Convicted after two and a half years, she went to prison where she died 21 weeks later.
Her Son and our ancestor Abraham petitioned the authorities after the trials were discredited and ended to recoup the money spent on her upkeep in prison. This was considered testament to her innocence.
Now for a twist on this story, the other side of the Salem witch trials was the Putnam family, amongst which we also have family members. That’s right, the great grand-daughter of Deacon Edward Putnam married the 2x great grand-son of Ann Foster. In fact, one of Ann Foster’s accusers was Ann Putnam, Edward’s niece. We can hope the reconciliation was touching.
When researching genealogy you find a very human story.
Lets take a moment to discuss the farthest reaching relative in any of the trees posted here. That is Achiulf. Now first, this research is not our own. It comes from a worldbook encyclopedia of research on a tree at Ancestry.com which was shared. This connection is through Charlemagne and the link to Charlemagne is well documented. However does that mean we should call ourselves descendents of the Ostrogoths? Well sure, if you want your friends to look at you sideways.
In the end the ancient records on this site are more for informational purposes to show how diverse human progress has been and how our lives were shaped by it. You cannot get to know Achiulf. Not a lot is even written about the Amali dynasty on Wikipedia. However it is an interesting dive into history none the less. Take it for what it is. A curiosity and a reason to see the whole world as tied together in an amazing organic way.
Genealogy can be an exciting past time for those who like puzzles. One would think it is the monotonous review and regurgitation of records kept over the centuries but you must consider that the goal of many of these records was to settle legal matters for those communities at that time. The idea that these records would be used this way hundreds of years later was a novel or unheard of concept.
However it is not always what you see but what you don’t see that leads you to discovery. In the case of Karen Anderson, this led us to an unknown child. It was known that she lived in Minnesota with her two sons, Christ and Andrew. However in her 1900 census response, she indicated that she had been the mother of 7 children. She listed 3 as living. Simple math leads us to the conclusion that as of 1901, Christ and Andrew had another sibling.
Little was known about this sibling until we found the family on the 1880 US Federal Census. There we find Christopher, Caren, Christian and a 6 year old daughter by the name of Clara.
To date little has been discovered about Clara. She would have been married likely by the 1900 census and using another name but the search continues. You have to know someone is there to search for them and sometimes your only clue is that someone should be there.
It was long believed that the Bly family in America started with Christ and Andrew Bly who immigrated to America from Norway. Our oldest generation was told that their parents were Christopher and Karen. It wasn’t until the discovery of a Christopher Anderson buried near Foston, MN that we discovered that Andrew and Christ came to America with their parents.
Some digging revealed Christopher Anderson’s original homestead from 1891. A review of the original land grant showed not only that the property is still clearly identifiable from arial photography but that his burial was done at a church built on the corner of his original homestead!
The story here is mainly from oral tradition. It goes that the family came to America around 1870. Much of their records went up in the great fire in Chicago. However we have come to find some records that suggest when and how some of the family arrived through emigration records and one record in Quebec where they would have stopped off on the way to Chicago. After some unknown time in Chicago, they moved to Douglas County, Minnesota. It was at this time that they discovered Bly Creek which would later give our family its name.
Karen appears to have immigrated first, bringing four children with her. Bertha, Karelius or Torveig, Andrew and Christ. Nothing is known about the first two and they appeared to have died before 1900. Christopher appears to have come at a later date as we do not find him on the ships manifest.
Through extensive review of a bydgebok found at the University of Minnesota by some experienced genealogists at www.norwayheritage.com, we have discovered much more about the family and their ancestors in Norway.
The Smith family is interesting in that there is very little recent immigration compared to other families. Most of the ancesters were in the “New World” in the 17th century, either in New France or the English colonies. Many of their children would later become the revolutionaries that set our country up for battle against England.
A number of relatives were soldiers in the US revolution including:
If you’re looking to join the Sons or Daughters of the American Revolution, now is your chance.